Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Prisk

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 31, 1999PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrosky, J.

¶ 1 Gary E. Prisk appeals from the trial court’s order denying his petition for post conviction relief pursuant to 42 Pa.C.S. §§ 9541 et seq. Because we agree with Appellant that his trial counsel was ineffective, we reverse and remand for a new trial.

¶ 2 Appellant was arrested in the state of Idaho in August 1994, was returned to Pennsylvania, and was charged with several counts of burglary and other theft-related offenses. These crimes allegedly occurred during three separate incidents in Centre County between February 1993 and August 1994. Appellant was thereafter tried on unrelated…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Commonwealth v. KimballSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Commonwealth v. LantzySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Commonwealth v. ClaypoolSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Commonwealth v. HarmonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PaddenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. Commonwealth v. YoungSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. Com. v. McGhee, N.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. In Re K.C. D.C.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API