Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Padden

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 23, 2001PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CERCONE, President Judge Emeritus.

¶ 1 Appellant, Thomas Padden, appeals, pro se, from the May 9, 2000 order denying, in part, his petition for relief filed pursuant to the Post Conviction Relief Act (PCRA). 1 We affirm in part and reverse in part and remand for an evidentiary hearing.

¶2 The underlying facts of this case have been set forth by our Court, in its previous memorandum disposition of Appellant’s direct appeal, as follows:

During the afternoon of April 8, 1995, Ms. Pamela Jones was working as a clerk in Gerrity’s Super Market [hereinafter “Gerrity’s] when an older male customer with…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Commonwealth v. LarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. Commonwealth v. TravagliaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Commonwealth v. KimballSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CollinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. Commonwealth v. BedellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  3. Commonwealth v. TharpSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Commonwealth v. McCauleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. Holland v. HornCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API