Town of Seaford v. Eastern Shore Public Service Co.
Superior Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Rodney, J.,
delivering the opinion of the Court:
The plaintiff contends that his action in declaring generally on the bonds and reserving the assignment of breaches to the replication is in accordance with established practice. This is not controverted. The plaintiff, however, contends that the action of the defendant in failing to demur to the replication, but on the contrary of filing the rejoinder, is, in effect, a plea of confession and avoidance of the matters set forth in said replication and Bill of Particulars. Without prolonging the discussion, we will briefly state our views.
The…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Fawcett v. Town of Mt. AirySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
- City of Austin v. McCallTexas Supreme Court · 1902
- City of Crawfordsville v. BradenIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Overall v. City of MadisonvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
- Hyatt v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mayor and Council of Wilmington v. DukesSupreme Court of Delaware · 1960
- Philadelphia, Baltimore & Washington Railroad v. Mayor & Council of WilmingtonCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1948
- Delmarva Power & Light Co. v. City of SeafordSupreme Court of Delaware · 1990
- U.S. Industries, Inc. v. GreggDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1978
- Ellis D. Taylor, Inc. v. Craft Builders, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.