Delmarva Power & Light Co. v. City of Seaford
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
CHRISTIE, Chief Justice:
This is an appeal from a grant of summary judgment in favor of the appellee, City of Seaford (Seaford). The Superior Court held that there were no material issues of fact in dispute and that the appellant, Delmarva Power & Light Company (Delmarva), was not entitled to a claim for inverse condemnation as a matter of law when two of its customers changed their electrical service to Seaford’s municipal utility after the property on which they were located was annexed by Seaford.
The parties agree on the facts which gave rise to this dispute, and we will recite the Superior…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Tennessee Electric Power Co. v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Hardin v. Kentucky Utilities Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Blair v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Pearsall v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Poudre Valley Rural Electric Ass'n v. City of LovelandSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- In Re Vermont Electric Power Producers, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1996
- Eastern Shore Natural Gas Co. v. Delaware Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Delaware · 1994
- Eastern Shore Natural Gas Co. v. Delaware Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Delaware · 1993
- Moongate Water Co., Inc. v. City of Las CrucesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2013
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.