Legal Opinion

Unsatisfied Cl. & Judg. Fd. Bd. v. Concord Ins.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided April 14, 1970PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

110 N.J. Super. 191 (1970)

264 A.2d 757

UNSATISFIED CLAIM AND JUDGMENT FUND BOARD, PLAINTIFF,

v.

CONCORD INSURANCE CO., LENOX FINANCE CO., ETHEL ODERMAN AND CALVIN JOYNER, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.

Decided April 14, 1970.

Mr. Martin L. Sisselman, Esq., for plaintiff (Messrs. James & Addas, attorneys).

Mr. Sheldon A. Siegel, Esq., for defendant Concord Insurance Co. (Messrs. Goldberger, Siegel & Finn, attorneys).

Mr. Murray G. Simon, Esq., for defendant Lenox Finance Company, Ethel Oderman and Calvin Joyner (Messrs. Simon, Denstman & Noonan, attorneys).

TUMULTY, J.S.C.

This…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. State Ex Rel. Farmers Mutuals Automobile Insurance v. WeberSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. SempleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  4. LeFelt v. NasarowNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
  5. State v. MurtesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1957

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Young v. ByrneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
  2. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. BowserColorado Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Hammond v. DoanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
  4. New Jersey Mfrs. Ins. v. GriffinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
  5. Town of Bay Harbor Islands v. DriggsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API