Legal Opinion

Hammond v. Doan

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided February 11, 1974PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

127 N.J. Super. 67 (1974)

316 A.2d 68

THEODORE HAMMOND, PLAINTIFF,

v.

BRUCE C. DOAN, DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.

Decided February 11, 1974.

Mr. Charles I. Tighe, III for plaintiff (Messrs. Toll, Friedman, Pinsky & Jones, attorneys).

Mr. Charles A. Winkelried for defendant.

RIZZI, A.J.S.C.

This is an auto negligence case in which defendant moves for an order requiring a pretrial hearing and disposition of his second separate defense which alleges that the statutory threshold requirements of the New Jersey Automobile Reparation Reform Act, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-1 et seq., (otherwise,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pinnick v. ClearyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
  2. Grace v. HowlettIllinois Supreme Court · 1972
  3. REGO INDUSTRIES v. American Mod. Metals Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966
  4. Rankin v. SowinskiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972
  5. Vonins, Inc. v. RaffNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. New Jersey Ass'n for Retarded Citizens, Inc. v. New Jersey Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  2. Rybeck v. RybeckNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
  3. Mladenov v. Wegmans Food Markets, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2015
  4. Matter of Ass'n of Trial Lawyers of Am.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
  5. Falcone v. BrankerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API