State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Semple
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Eagen,
This is a declaratory proceeding wherein the court below entered judgment for the petitioner. It is our conclusion that the court abused its discretion in assuming jurisdiction of the proceeding and that a vacation of the judgment is required.
The salient facts necessary for the purposes of this opinion are as follows: The defendant-appellant, Brown, suffered serious injuries when struck by an automobile operated by the appellant-defendant, Semple. At the time, the title to the automobile involved was registered in the name of one Warren Witmer. A policy of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- McWilliams v. McCabeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Keystone Insurance v. Warehousing & Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Stofflet & Tillotson v. Chester Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
3Cited by39 opinions
- Firemen's Ins. Co. of Newark, New Jersey v. BurchTexas Supreme Court · 1968
- Friestad v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. S. G. S. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Mains v. FultonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Semple v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1963
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.