Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Semple

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 21, 1962No. Appeal, 230PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Eagen,

This is a declaratory proceeding wherein the court below entered judgment for the petitioner. It is our conclusion that the court abused its discretion in assuming jurisdiction of the proceeding and that a vacation of the judgment is required.

The salient facts necessary for the purposes of this opinion are as follows: The defendant-appellant, Brown, suffered serious injuries when struck by an automobile operated by the appellant-defendant, Semple. At the time, the title to the automobile involved was registered in the name of one Warren Witmer. A policy of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McWilliams v. McCabeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  2. Keystone Insurance v. Warehousing & Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  3. Stofflet & Tillotson v. Chester Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Firemen's Ins. Co. of Newark, New Jersey v. BurchTexas Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Friestad v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. S. G. S. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Mains v. FultonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  5. Semple v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1963

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API