Legal Opinion
United States v. Robert Stinson, Jr.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided August 21, 2013No. 12-2012PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CHAGARES, Circuit Judge.
Robert Stinson pled guilty to a twenty-six count indictment that arose out of a fraud scheme that he operated from 2006 to 2010. Stinson appeals his sentence and argues that the District Court improperly applied a fraud enhancement, committed procedural error during sentencing, and imposed a sentence that was substantively unreasonable. His appeal requires us to define the scope of U.S.S.G. § 2B1.1(b)(15)(A), which increases a defendant’s offense level by two points when “the defendant derived more than $1,000,000 in gross receipts from one or more financial…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Puckett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- United States v. WarshakCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Craig B. SokolowCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Curtis EvansCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- United States v. John G. Bennett, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- United States v. Amy GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- Brotherston v. Putnam InvestmentsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Cory FosterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- United States v. William DahlCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Michael CalabrettaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.