Legal Opinion

Freeman v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 24, 2008No. 110 C.D. 2008, 288 C.D. 2008PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge SIMPSON.

Timothy Freeman petitions for review of an order of the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole (Board) that recalculated his maximum sentence date. Freeman asserts the Board failed to properly credit his original state sentence with the time he served from the date of his arrest on a new federal charge until the time of sentencing on that charge. Because we rejected a similar assertion in our recent decision in Bowman v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole, 930 A.2d 599 (Pa.Cmwlth.2007), appeal denied, 596 Pa. 735, 945 A.2d 172 (2008), we affirm.

In 1998, the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Reno v. KoraySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Gaito v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. McCray v. Pennsylvania Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. Armbruster v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. D. Williams v. PA BPPCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API