Baasit v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Judge SIMPSON.
In an appeal that re-examines credit issues between federal criminal sentences and state criminal sentences, Ismail Baasit (Inmate) petitions for review from an order of the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole (Board) that denied his administrative appeal from a prior order recommitting him as a convicted parole violator and recalculating the maximum date of his original state sentence. Inmate contends the Board incorrectly recalculated his maximum sentence date by failing to credit the un-served balance of his state sentence with four years he spent in…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Reno v. KoraySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Gaito v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Martin v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- McCray v. Pennsylvania Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Smith, D. v. PA Board of Probation & Parole, Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Brown v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Hammonds v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Stroud v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Fumea v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.