Legal Opinion

Baasit v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 11, 2014PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge SIMPSON.

In an appeal that re-examines credit issues between federal criminal sentences and state criminal sentences, Ismail Baasit (Inmate) petitions for review from an order of the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole (Board) that denied his administrative appeal from a prior order recommitting him as a convicted parole violator and recalculating the maximum date of his original state sentence. Inmate contends the Board incorrectly recalculated his maximum sentence date by failing to credit the un-served balance of his state sentence with four years he spent in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Reno v. KoraySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Gaito v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Martin v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. McCray v. Pennsylvania Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Smith, D. v. PA Board of Probation & Parole, Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. Brown v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. Hammonds v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. Stroud v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  5. Fumea v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API