City of Chicago v. Pooh Bah Enterprises, Inc.
Illinois Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Karmeier
Chief Justice Thomas and Justices Fitzgerald, Kilbride, and Garman concurred in the judgment and opinion.
Justice Freeman dissented upon denial of rehearing, with opinion.
Justice Burke took no part in the decision.
OPINION
Section 4 — 60—140(d) of the Municipal Code of Chicago prohibits establishments licensed to serve alcoholic beverages from permitting any employee, entertainer or patron to engage in “any live act, demonstration, dance or exhibition *** which exposes to public view *** [h]is or her genitals, pubic hair, buttocks *** or [a]ny portion of the female breast at or below the areola…
2Cases cited77 opinions
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Steffel v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Pooh-Bah Enterprises, Inc. v. County of CookIllinois Supreme Court · 2009
- Bartlow v. CostiganIllinois Supreme Court · 2014
- Owens v. Department of Human RightsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
- People v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 2009
- Peterson v. Village of Downers GroveDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.