Legal Opinion
State v. Stummer
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided October 9, 2008No. CR-07-0429-PRPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BERCH, Vice Chief Justice.
¶ 1 Petitioners Hubert August Stammer and Dennis Allen Lumm were charged with violating Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 13-1422 (2005), which forbids adult bookstores from remaining open during certain early morning hours. We have been asked to determine whether the hours of operation provision of § 13-1422 violates the free speech provision of the Arizona Constitution.
I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶ 2 Petitioners operate adult-oriented businesses in Phoenix that sell sexually explicit books and magazines. They were charged with violating A.R.S. §…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- City of Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Reno v. American Civil Liberties UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. Playboy Entertainment Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Coleman v. City of MesaArizona Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. CotaArizona Supreme Court · 2012
- Karen Fann v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 2021
- Arizona Minority Coalition for Fair Redistricting v. Redistricting Com'n Arizona IndependentArizona Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. ZamoraCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.