Legal Opinion
Zahl v. Harper
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided February 26, 2002No. 01-1817PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ROSENN, Circuit Judge.
This appeal, in an action seeking federal injunctive relief from state disciplinary proceedings against a medical practitioner, raises important questions concerning the application of the doctrines of preemption and abstention. The New Jersey State Attorney General (Attorney General) instituted disciplinary proceedings against Kenneth Zahl, M.D. (Zahl), alleging, inter alia, violations of the federal Medicare statute and regulations. Zahl sought an injunction in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey to restrain the Attorney…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Kaul v. ChristieDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2019
- Kendall v. RussellCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Hi Tech Trans, LLC David Stoller v. State of New Jersey, Department of Environmental Protection Wolfgang Skacel, C.H.M.M. Bradley M. Campbell.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Zahl v. HarperCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- Figard v. PHH Mortgage Corp. (In Re Figard)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.