Legal Opinion · Concurring in the judgment
Hi Tech Trans, LLC David Stoller v. State of New Jersey, Department of Environmental Protection Wolfgang Skacel, C.H.M.M. Bradley M. Campbell.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided September 2, 2004No. 03-2773, 03-2849PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Concurring in the judgmentSmith, Circuit Judge
OPINION
McKEE, Circuit Judge.
Hi Tech Trans, LLC, which operates a solid waste disposal facility in Newark, New Jersey, and its Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, David Stoller (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Hi Tech”), sought declaratory relief against an administrative enforcement proceeding the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (“NJDEP”) brought against Hi Tech. Hi Tech claimed that certain permit and license requirements imposed on solid waste disposal facilities by the New Jersey Solid Waste Management Act (“SWMA”), N.J.S.A. 13:1E-1 to -207, and its…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- New York Susquehanna and Western Railway Corp. v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Roth v. NORFALCO LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- Matusow v. Trans-County Title Agency, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Interfaith Community Organization Inc. v. PPG Industries, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2010
- Baykeeper v. NL Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.