Legal Opinion
Reilly v. Perehinys
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided November 12, 1954PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
33 N.J. Super. 69 (1954)
109 A.2d 449
HUGH REILLY, GENERAL ADMINISTRATOR, AND ADMINISTRATOR AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF EDWARD JAMES REILLY, DECEASED, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
GEORGE PEREHINYS, CATHERINE PEREHINYS, HIS WIFE, AND ROBERT PEREHINYS, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued October 25, 1954.
Decided November 12, 1954.
Before Judges CLAPP, JAYNE and FRANCIS.
Mr. Theodore G. Fitzgeorge argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent.
Mr. George Warren argued the cause for defendants-appellants (Messrs. Herr & Fisher, attorneys).
The opinion of the court…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Klapprott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Thomson v. WoosterSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Ohio Central R. Co. v. Central Trust Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Sheehy v. MandevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1812
- Loranger v. AlbanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Interchemical Corp. v. Uncas Printing & Fin. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- Davis v. DND/Fidoreo, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
- Tradesmens Nat. Bank and Trust Co. v. CummingsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
- Heimbach v. MuellerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
- Regional Const. Corp. v. RayNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2003
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.