Legal Opinion

Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Hawkins

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 4, 1932No. 3768PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCulpepper, J.

Plaintiff appellee’s application for rehearing sets out that the court in its original opinion, 137 So. 588, erred in holding the allegations of the petition insufficient to permit the introduction in evidence of the contract attached and made part thereof. The reason for so holding, as the opinion indicates, was that there was such variance between the allegations of the petition and the contract as to become material and • therefore fatal. Plaintiff contends the court erred in holding that there was a material variance. It is contended that: “Upon a consideration of the entire petition,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Aber v. Pennsylvania Co. for Insurances on LivesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. Sheehy v. MandevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1812
  3. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. HawkinsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1931
  4. Davenport Locomotive Works v. Lemann Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1907
  5. Shaw v. NobleSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1860

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Air Waves, Inc. v. LinkLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1956
  2. Tri-State Oil Tool Company v. Pioneer Oil & Gas Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
  3. Dumaine v. Gay, Sullivan & Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API