Legal Opinion

Merritt v. Dito

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 29, 2011No. A128921PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McGUINESS, P. J.

In an earlier appeal arising out of this probate matter, we affirmed the trial court’s ruling that respondent Elenice S. Dito is the surviving spouse of decedent Frank P. Dito1 and is entitled to receive a share of his estate as an omitted spouse pursuant to Probate Code2 section 21610 et seq. After the earlier appeal had been decided, appellants Barbara and George Merritt filed a petition alleging that Elenice is liable for financial elder abuse committed against Frank. The trial court sustained a demurrer to the petition without leave to amend on the ground the claim…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Schifando v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Molien v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Zelig v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Moore v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Mycogen Corp. v. Monsanto Co.California Supreme Court · 2002

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. City of Oakland v. Oakland Police & Fire Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  2. Federal Home Loan Bank v. Countrywide Financial Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2013
  3. Hedwall v. PCMV, LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  4. Bank of America v. MitchellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  5. Gillies v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2017

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API