Legal Opinion
Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. v. Cardio Flow, Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided February 27, 2020No. 0:18-cv-01253Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Cardiovascular Systems, Inc., Case No. 0:18-cv-1253-SRN-KMM Plaintiff, v. ORDER Cardio Flow, Inc., Defendant. This case is before the Court on Plaintiff Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. (“CSI”)’s Motion to Amend the Complaint. (ECF No. 95.) Defendant Cardio Flow, Inc. (“Cardio Flow”) opposes the Motion. After careful consideration, the Court determines that CSI’s Motion should be DENIED. I. Factual Background CSI seeks to amend its Complaint to include a tortious interference with contract claim that it contends it learned about for the first…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sherman v. Winco Fireworks, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- E-Shops Corp. v. U.S. Bank National Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- Furlev Sales & Associates, Inc. v. North American Automotive Warehouse, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Harris Ex Rel. the Estate of Ward v. Fedex National LTL, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
- Thomas Kmak v. American Century CompaniesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.