Legal Opinion
Francis P. Serra v. R. James Nicholson
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
Decided August 5, 2005No. 02-0399(E)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
IVERS, Chief Judge:
Before the Court is Rhonda Serra’s application for attorney fees and expenses pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), in the amount of $11,465.40. Also before the Court is her “Motion to Substitute a Party,” the Secretary’s “Motion to Recall Mandate,” and two supplemental EAJA applications. For the reasons set forth below, the Court will deny the motion to substitute, grant the motion to recall mandate, and deny the EAJA application and the supplemental applications.
I. BACKGROUND
A December 4, 2001, decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Brown v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Scarborough v. PrincipiSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Ardestani v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Vda de Landicho v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1994
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Pekular v. MansfieldUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2007
- Bobby G. Smith v. Eric K. ShinsekiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2014
- Carroll B. Westfall v. Robert A. McDonaldUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2015
- Celerina Pelea v. R. James NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2006
- Andrew J. Newman v. Eric K. ShinsekiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.