Legal Opinion

ZIELLO v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 19, 1999No. B133123PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

EPSTEIN, J.

In this case we decide whether a judgment debtor, who pays and does not appeal the amount of a judgment for damages, but who does appeal from the trial court’s order after judgment assessing costs and attorney’s fees, is required to file an appeal bond to stay execution on the unpaid amounts. We conclude that an appeal bond is not required in this situation.

Factual and Procedural Summary

This case arises from an ongoing dispute between a mortgagor and mortgagee over proceeds from an earthquake insurance policy. The policy was obtained by the mortgagor without compulsion of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lakin v. Watkins Associated IndustriesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Scott Co. of California v. Blount, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Grant v. List & LathropCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  4. Ziello v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. CHAPALA MANAGEMENT CORP. v. StantonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  2. Quiles v. ParentCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  3. Land Value Holdings, LLC v. Miller CA1/3California Court of Appeal · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API