Legal Opinion

In re Disciplinary Action against Pearson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 4, 2017No. A17-1613Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility has filed a petition for disciplinary action alleging that respondent Todd Curtis Pearson has committed professional misconduct warranting public discipline—namely, failing to maintain required trust-account books and records, a violation of the terms of his disciplinary probation that we imposed in In re Pearson, 888 N.W.2d 319 (Minn. 2016). See Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 1.15(c)(3), 1.15(h) as interpreted by Appendix 1, 3.4(c), and 8.4(d).

Respondent and the Director have entered into a stipulation for discipline. In it,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re Disciplinary Action Against PearsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API