Legal Opinion

Cleveland,Cincinnati,Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Lutz

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 8, 1917No. 9,501PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From Clark Circuit Court; James W. Fortune, Judge. Action by Burdette C. Lutz, administrator of the estate of Lydia A. Steirheim', deceased, against The Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago and St. Louis Railway Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtIbach, P. J.

Appellee recovered a judgment against appellant for $2,000 as damages for the killing of his decedent at a public street crossing in the town of Charlestown. Appellant assigns as error: (1) The overruling of its demurrer to the first paragraph of amended complaint; (2) the overruling of its demurrer to the second paragraph of amended complaint; (3, 4) the overruling of its motion for judgment on the answers to interrogatories, and for a new trial, respectively.

I. The first two assigned errors present no question. This is a second appeal. Lutz, Admr., v. Cleveland, etc., R. Co. (1914), 59 Ind.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. StarksIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. Sovereign Camp of Woodmen of the World v. LathamIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. Stevens v. TempletonIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Dieckman v. Louisville & Southern Indiana Traction Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1909
  5. Indianapolis Union Railway Co. v. SampleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Carianni v. SchwenkerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  2. Magenheimer v. State Ex Rel. DaltonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1950
  3. KIRKPATRICK v. BowyerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1960
  4. Slifer v. WilliardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1921
  5. City of New Albany v. LyonsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API