Legal Opinion
Carianni v. Schwenker
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided November 25, 1955PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
38 N.J. Super. 350 (1955)
118 A.2d 847
EMANUEL CARIANNI, ADMINISTRATOR AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF TINA CARIANNI, DECEASED, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
ROBERT F. SCHWENKER, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued October 10, 1955.
Decided November 25, 1955.
Before Judges GOLDMANN, FREUND and CONFORD.
Mr. Francis Sorin argued the cause for plaintiff-appellant.
Mr. E. Burke Finnerty argued the cause for defendant-respondent (Messrs. Townsend & Doyle, attorneys).
The opinion of the court was delivered by CONFORD, J.A.D.
Who is a "dependent" of the decedent, for…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Duval v. HuntSupreme Court of Florida · 1894
- State v. MeinkenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Wells-Dickey Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Turon v. J. & L. CONSTRUCTION CO.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Deaney v. Linen Thread Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Green v. BittnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- Hartman v. City of BrigantineNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- Adams v. SparacioWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1973
- Karafa v. NJ State Lottery Comm.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
- Dept. of Health v. SOL SCHNOLL DRESSED POULTRYNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.