Kaufman v. U. S. National Bank
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error to the district court for Douglas county. Tried below before Doane, J. cited, as to the construction of the two instruments: Goodrich v. Me Clary, 3 Neb., 130; Tootle v. Elgutter, 14 Id., 159; Nidle v. State Bank, 13 Id., 246; Collingwood v. Merchants’ Bank, 15 Id., 121; Delaney v. Linder, 22 Id., 280; Cortelyou v. Maben, Id., 700; Greenleaf, Ev., sec. 277; Edwards v. Clement, 45 N. W. Rep. [Mich.], 1107 ; Begg v. Forbes, 30 Eng.
Read the full summary
Error to the district court for Douglas county. Tried below before Doane, J. cited, as to the construction of the two instruments: Goodrich v. Me Clary, 3 Neb., 130; Tootle v. Elgutter, 14 Id., 159; Nidle v. State Bank, 13 Id., 246; Collingwood v. Merchants’ Bank, 15 Id., 121; Delaney v. Linder, 22 Id., 280; Cortelyou v. Maben, Id., 700; Greenleaf, Ev., sec. 277; Edwards v. Clement, 45 N. W. Rep. [Mich.], 1107 ; Begg v. Forbes, 30 Eng. L. & Eq., 508; Etting v. Bank, 11 Wheat. [U. S.], 74; Bank v. Dana, 79 N. Y., 108 ; Edelman v. Yealcel, 27 Pa. St., 26. cited : Shamp v. Meyer, 20 Neb., 223,…
1Per curiam
This is an action upon two promissory notes, one for $1,350 and the other for $500, both drawing interest at ten per cent.
The defendants answered separately, but appear by the same attorneys. The answers of the defendants consist of certain special denials'and allege that the $1,350 note sued on was not guaranteed or assumed to be paid by them or *663either of them. The instruments under which it is claimed the defendants are liable are as follows:
“ This indenture made this 8th day of February, A. D. 1888, between Kaufman Bros., consisting of David Kaufman and Isaac Kaufman, doing business under…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lawrence v. . FoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
- Farley v. ClevelandNew York Supreme Court · 1825
- King v. WhitelyNew York Court of Chancery · 1843
- Schemerhorn v. VanderheydenNew York Supreme Court · 1806
- Bassett v. HughesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1877
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Petersen v. LydersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Atkinson v. ReynoldsNebraska Supreme Court · 1936
- Union Pacific Railway Co. v. Metcalf & WoodNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
- Davis v. National Bank of CommerceNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
- Tecumseh National Bank v. BestNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.