Davis v. National Bank of Commerce
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error from the district court of Douglas county. Tried below before Irvine, «T. cited : Wilson v. Wilson, 30 O. St., 365; Milroy v. Spur Mountain Iron Mining Co., 43 Mich., 231; Buchanan v. Dorsey, 11 Neb., 373; Trimble v. Strother, 25 O. St., 378 ; Judson v. Gray, 17 How. Pr. [N. Y.j, 289 ; Auburn City Bank v. Leonard,, 40 Barb. [N. Y.j, 119; Brewer v. Maurer, 38 O. St., 543; Wood v. Moriariy, 14 Atl.
Read the full summary
Error from the district court of Douglas county. Tried below before Irvine, «T. cited : Wilson v. Wilson, 30 O. St., 365; Milroy v. Spur Mountain Iron Mining Co., 43 Mich., 231; Buchanan v. Dorsey, 11 Neb., 373; Trimble v. Strother, 25 O. St., 378 ; Judson v. Gray, 17 How. Pr. [N. Y.j, 289 ; Auburn City Bank v. Leonard,, 40 Barb. [N. Y.j, 119; Brewer v. Maurer, 38 O. St., 543; Wood v. Moriariy, 14 Atl. Rep. [R. I.], 855; Domain v. Judson, 26 N. E. Rep. rind.1, 563; Parmalee v. Wiqqenhorn, 6 Neb., 322.
1Opinion of the Court
Ryan, C.
On the 8th day cf February, 1888, plaintiffs in error entered into a written agreement with the firm of Kaufman Bros., by the terms of which the said plaintiffs in error agreed to pay certain debts of Kaufman Bros. The consideration upon which the agreement was based was the transfer of all the property of said firm and its members, subject to certain exemptions of homestead rights enumerated, to the plaintiffs in error. The defendant in error holds certain notes which the plaintiffs in error by the terms of the above agreement were bound to pay. For the purpose of this case it may be…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Kaufman v. U. S. National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1891
- Kaufman v. CoburnNebraska Supreme Court · 1890
3Cited by3 opinions
- Slater v. SkirvingNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
- City Nat. Bank of Huron, SD v. FullerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
- Bethlehem Iron Co. v. HoadleyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Rhode Island · 1907