Legal Opinion

Tecumseh National Bank v. Best

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1897No. 7030PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from the district court of Johnson county. Tried below before Babcock, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Ryan, C.

In this case there was a judgment against the Tecumseh National Bank as prayed by the plaintiff in the district court of Johnson county. The bank seeks a reversal of this judgment on two grounds, of which the first is that the petition failed to state a cause of action. The second is that the finding against the bank was not sustained by the evidence.

*519The averments of the petition, in substance, are that about May 1,1889, James D. Russell, Charles A. Holmes, Warren Holmes, and James Bennett, as an association under the name of Russell & Holmes, were doing a general banking business in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Doll v. CrumeNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Sample v. HaleNebraska Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Barnett v. PrattNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. BellNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Hare v. MurphyNebraska Supreme Court · 1895

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Atkinson v. ReynoldsNebraska Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Coleman v. BeckNebraska Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Tecumseh National Bank v. SaundersNebraska Supreme Court · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API