Legal Opinion

Davis v. Potter

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 27, 1940No. Appeal, 220PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Stern,

On the south sidewalk of Federal Street, in the City of Philadelphia, beginning a foot or two east of Fifth Street and extending east about thirteen feet and from the houseline north about four feet, there was a general elevation in the pavement of from % of an inch to 1% inches, bordered by a flat strip or rim of iron. This area originally had been the site of a grating over a light Avell, but Avas later paved with cement.

On November 25, 1938, the sidewalk was covered with snow and ice as the result of a heavy storm and freezing weather. Plaintiff, walking across…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. German v. McKeesport City (Et Al.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  2. Burns v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. McGlinn v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Reddington v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  5. Foster Et Ux. v. West View Boro.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Reinoso, G. v. Heritage Warminster SPESuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  2. Harrison Et Vir. v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  3. Mull v. IckesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  4. Bosack v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  5. Aloia v. City of WashingtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API