Legal Opinion

Laskaris v. Thornburgh

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided April 24, 1984No. 83-5191PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

GARTH, Circuit Judge:

In this case appellants Peter J. Laskaris and Michael Skapura contend that they were improperly denied a jury trial on their claims that they were unlawfully discharged because of their political affiliation. We hold that Laskaris and Skapura’s claims for compensatory and punitive damages entitled them to a jury trial. The district court’s failure to award a jury trial, however, was harmless, because the evidence produced at trial was insufficient to avoid a directed verdict in favor of the defendants. Thus we affirm.

I

Laskaris and Skapura were…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Gomez v. ToledoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. Smith v. City of AllentownCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  2. John H. Cox v. Keystone Carbon Company, Richard Reuscher and William ReuscherCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  3. Keenan v. City of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  4. Stott v. HaworthCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
  5. Dick Dickeson and Beth Weaver v. Deloyd Quarberg and the Board of County Commissioners of Hot Springs County, WyomingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API