Legal Opinion

Canister Co. v. National Can Corp.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided November 23, 1943No. Civ. No. 309PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEAHY, District Judge.

This action is one by a buyer against a seller for breach of contract for failure to complete the manufacture and delivery of metal fittings for fibre-body one-gallon cans in accordance with certain alleged contracts between the parties, whereunder plaintiff claims $10,000,000 damages. So far, four motions have been argued.

I. Defendant’s motion under Rule 42(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c. In paragraphs 4 and 5 of its answer defendant denies the making of the contract on February 2, 1943, for the delivery of black plate…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rickenbacher Transp., Inc. v. Pennsylvania R. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1942

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Newton v. YatesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Canister Co. v. Leahy, Chief JudgeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
  3. Canister Co. v. National Can CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
  4. Zenith Radio Corp. v. Radio Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1952
  5. Canister Co. v. National Can Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1948

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API