Legal Opinion

Stierlen v. Stierlen

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 2, 1912No. Civ. No. 1019PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco; and from an order denying a new trial. Geo. A. Sturtevant, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal by plaintiff from a judgment in favor of defendants, and from an order refusing a new trial, in an action to annul the marriage of the defendants.

In February, 1886, the plaintiff and the defendant George Stierlen were married in San Francisco. There they continuously resided from that time until the month of March, 1896, when George Stierlen left plaintiff, and after visiting several places, arrived in the state of North Dakota in the following month, where he remained until the following November, when he returned to California and permanently resumed his residence here —…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Martinson v. MarzolfNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1905
  2. McGrew v. Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Freeman v. WoodNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Kitzman v. Minnesota Thresher Manufacturing Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Knox v. CliffordWisconsin Supreme Court · 1877

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McGuinness v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Williams v. ReedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  3. Montgomery v. NormanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. Momphrey v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API