Legal Opinion

McGrew v. Mutual Life Insurance

California Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1901No. S.F. No. 1230PublishedCited by 22 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcFARLAND,J.

—Action on a life insurance policy. Judg ment was for plaintiff in the court below, and from the judgment defendant appealed.

The respondent is a resident of California, where this action was commenced, and the appellant is a resident of the state of New York. The defense is rather a remarkable one; it rests upon a decree of divorce rendered by a court of the Republic of Hawaii in an action brought there against the present respondent by the guardian of her husband,—a decree which could not have been obtained here,—and upon a Hawaiian statute which has no force here, except by'comity.

The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Whitney v. DodgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Estate of WickesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Mellen v. MellenNew York Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Hewes v. HewesNew York Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Carter v. Mutual Life InsuranceHawaii Supreme Court · 1895

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Shaw v. Board of AdministrationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  2. In Re MeansSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  3. White v. Brotherhood of American YeomenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  4. Rountree v. FrazeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
  5. Humphreys v. HumphreysSupreme Court of Virginia · 1924

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API