Legal Opinion

Montgomery v. Norman

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 27, 1953No. Civ. 4828PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.

On January 23, 1953, plaintiff filed a complaint for money claimed due on a contract which was made payable in Texas. He obtained a writ of attachment and attached certain real property of defendant. Defendant filed a motion to require security for costs and to have the writ of attachment discharged, and filed a demurrer to the complaint on February 11th. On February 18th, prior to the ruling on the demurrer, plaintiff filed an amended complaint containing an additional allegation that defendant, in California, orally agreed to pay the amount claimed. On February 25, the hearing was had on…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Stearus v. AguirreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
  2. Bond v. PachecoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  3. McDonald v. LeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Gossman v. GossmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  5. Lacoste v. EastlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. West Coast Shows, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1970
  2. Poster v. Southern California Rapid Transit DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. County of Ventura v. TillettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  4. Bristol Convalescent Hospital v. StoneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. California Accounts, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API