Legal Opinion
Behlmer v. Louisville & N. R. Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Carolina
Decided January 22, 1896PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIMONTON, Circuit Judge.
This is a proceeding in equity-brought to enforce a finding of the interstate commerce commission, under section 5 of the act to amend an act to regulate commerce, approved March 2, 1889. 25 Stat. 855. This section 5 amends section Hi of the amended act, which was approved 4th of February, 1887. 24 Stat. 379. The petitioner is a resident of Summerville, an incorporated town on the line of the South Carolina Railway Company, about 22 miles from Charleston, S. C. He complained that he had been compelled to pay upon a shipment of two car loads of hay, from Memphis to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hoard v. Chesapeake & Ohio RailwaySupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California · 1892
3Cited by4 opinions
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Western New York & P. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania · 1897
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Western & A. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Georgia · 1898
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Western & A. R.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1899
- Brewer v. Central of Georgia Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of Georgia · 1898