Legal Opinion
Baeza v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 14, 2011No. F061594PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HILL, P. J.
Petitioners seek a writ of mandate directing respondent trial court to vacate its order requiring them to comply with certain contractual nonadversarial prelitigation procedures prior to continuing to prosecute their construction defect action against real party in interest, Castle & Cooke California, Inc. (Castle & Cooke). We deny the petition.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Petitioners are the owners of 32 homes purchased from Castle & Cooke, the developer. Petitioners and other plaintiffs1 filed an action against Castle & Cooke and other defendants, alleging there are…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Hassan v. Mercy American River HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Valley Bank of Nevada v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Hogya v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Jose Ronderos v. Usf Reddaway, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
- United Health Centers of the San Joaquin Valley, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- McCaffrey Group, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Chun Ping Turng v. Guaranteed Rate, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2019
- Duke v. Superior Court of Kern Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.