Legal Opinion

Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. v. Town of Boaz

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 5, 1925No. 8 Div. 778PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

Appellant sought by common-law writ ,of certiorari to quash and annul certain proceedings of the town of Boaz to assess against the property of appellant certain cost of improving a street in said town. There was full answer made, and the record and proceedings sought to be annulled constituted an exhibit thereto. Upon consideration thereof, the trial court denied relief, and dismissed the petition, from which judgment petitioner has prosecuted this appeal.

“As a rule, common-law certiorari will not lie to bring up or review, matters from -an inferior to a superior tribunal when such matter…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City of Birmingham v. WillsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  2. City of Decatur v. BrockSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  3. City of Decatur v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  4. Alabama Traction Co. v. Selma Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  5. City of Decatur v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. Town of BoazSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  2. State Ex Rel. Garrow v. GraysonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  3. Walton v. City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  4. City of Albany v. SpraginsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  5. Holley v. BrunsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API