Legal Opinion

Holley v. Brunson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 9, 1930No. 4 Div. 516PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPoster, J.

While we are in accord with the opinion of the Court of Appeals, in view of the argument of counsel, we deem it advisable to make some additional observations.

We may add that the principle affirming certiorari as a method of review in this nature of case, as stated in Decatur v. Brock, 170 Ala. 149, 54 So. 209, has been reaffirmed in N., C. & St. L. Rwy. Co. v. Boaz, 213 Ala. 667, 106 So. 192; Albany v. Spragins, 214 Ala. 449, 108 So. 32.

On the merits of the question involved, the opinion of the Court of Appeals relies on the authority of Pierce v. Huntsville, 185 Ala. 490, 64 So. 301. Upon…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. City of Decatur v. BrockSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  2. Van Antwerp v. Board of Com'rsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  3. Pierce v. City of HuntsvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  4. Ryan v. Mayor of TuscaloosaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
  5. City of Albany v. SpraginsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Newberry v. City of AndalusiaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  2. City of Jasper v. SandersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  3. Town of Linden v. American-LA France & Foamite Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  4. Southern Industrial Institute v. LeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  5. State Tax Commission v. Mississippi Power Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API