Legal Opinion

Walton v. City of Mobile

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 19, 1936No. 1 Div. 865, 866PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Justice.

The appellants, Walton and Burns, filed separate bills, under the provisions of section 9905 of the Code 1923, seeking to have, as appellants characterize them, the “so-called” proceedings by the commissioners of the city of Mobile in respect to “Paving Venture Number Twenty-Six” declared void and canceled as a cloud on their respective titles.

The city filed answers in each of said causes, which it prayed to be taken and considered as its cross-bill, seeking to enforce the alleged liens arising from the assessments made in said proceedings against the respective properties, and…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. City of Birmingham v. WillsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  2. Oxford v. EstesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  3. Penton v. Brown-Crummer Inv. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  4. City of Huntsville v. GudenrathSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  5. Courson v. TollisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Martin v. ReedSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  2. Ex Parte RegisterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  3. Grayson v. SchwabSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  4. Chenault v. City of RussellvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  5. Ex Parte FinleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1944

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API