Alabama Traction Co. v. Selma Trust & Savings Bank
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.
The bill is to enforce an asserted lien against the property of a street railway company, in favor of a municipality for the cost of paving the track, the spfice between the rails, and 18 inches outside of each rail, part of a public street.
The averments show the city of Decatur, a city of less than 6,000 inhabitants at the, time, undertook to assess the costs of such paving against the street railway company under authority of section 1374, Code of 1907 (Code of 1923, § 2189), which reads:
“Assessment as Against Street Gar or Railroad Tracies. — If there.be a street, electric, or other…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Norwood v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- South & North Alabama Railroad v. MorrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
- Oklahoma City v. ShieldsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Sioux City Street Railway Co. v. Sioux CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- City of New Haven v. Fair Haven & Westville RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1871
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Branyon v. KirkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
- City of Birmingham v. Hood-Mcpherson Realty Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Klein v. Jefferson County Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
- Georgia Power Co. v. City of DecaturSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
- Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. v. Town of BoazSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.