Legal Opinion
Kaselaan & D'Angelo Associates, Inc. v. D'Angelo
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided October 21, 1992No. Civ. A. No. 92-2282 (JBS)PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SIMANDLE, District Judge:
Presently before the court is the motion by plaintiffs, Kaselaan & D’Angelo Associates, Inc. and Hill International, Inc., to disqualify John J. Rosenberg, Esquire, and Varet, Marcus & Fink, P.C., as counsel for defendant William “Chip” D'Angelo, pursuant to the New Jersey Rules of Professional Conduct, Rules 1.9(a)(1), 1.9(a)(2), 1.9(b) and 1.10(a). For the reasons stated herein, plaintiffs’ motion will be granted.
Background
The present suit involves claims by plaintiffs, Kaselaan & D’Angelo, Inc. (“K & D”) and Hill International, Inc. (“Hill International”),…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- The Government of India and the Food Corporation of India v. Cook Industries, Inc. And Cook and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,675 James M. Richardson v. Hamilton International CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- In Re Corn Derivatives Antitrust Litigation (Mdl 414). Appeal of John E. Koerner & Co., Inc., Imperial Products Corporation, and Pan-O-Gold, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- United States Football League v. National Football LeagueDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Dewey v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Cardona v. General Motors Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1996
- City of Atlantic City v. TruposSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
- Carlyle Towers Condominium Ass'n v. Crossland Savings, FSBDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1996
- Jessen v. Hartford Cas. Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 2003
- Steel v. General Motors Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1995
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.