City of Atlantic City v. Trupos
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rivera-Soto
In the shifting of allegiances that arises when lawyers “change sides” in their representation of new clients, the confidences of prior clients must be preserved. The propriety of a lawyer representing a current client adverse to the interests of a former client generates a tension—between fealty to a former client and zealousness in favor of a current client—that this Court must address.
In this appeal, a law firm representing a municipality in certain real estate tax appeals matters discontinued that representation. Later, a number of taxpayers retained the law firm to appeal the real estate…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Manalapan Realty v. Township Committee of the Township of ManalapanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- Lasalle National Bank and Lake Properties Venture v. County of Lake and the Village of GrayslakeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Liberty Surplus Insurance v. AmorosoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
- United States Football League v. National Football LeagueDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Dewey v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Estate of Hanges v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
- McDade v. SiazonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2011
- Kane Properties, LLC v. City of HobokenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
- Carreno v. City of NewarkDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2011
- Judith A. Dinapoli v. Board of Education of the Township Of verona, Essex CountyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2014
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.