Legal Opinion

City of Atlantic City v. Trupos

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided April 26, 2010No. A-23 September Term 2009PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rivera-Soto

In the shifting of allegiances that arises when lawyers “change sides” in their representation of new clients, the confidences of prior clients must be preserved. The propriety of a lawyer representing a current client adverse to the interests of a former client generates a tension—between fealty to a former client and zealousness in favor of a current client—that this Court must address.

In this appeal, a law firm representing a municipality in certain real estate tax appeals matters discontinued that representation. Later, a number of taxpayers retained the law firm to appeal the real estate…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Manalapan Realty v. Township Committee of the Township of ManalapanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  2. Lasalle National Bank and Lake Properties Venture v. County of Lake and the Village of GrayslakeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  3. Liberty Surplus Insurance v. AmorosoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
  4. United States Football League v. National Football LeagueDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985
  5. Dewey v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1988

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Estate of Hanges v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
  2. McDade v. SiazonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2011
  3. Kane Properties, LLC v. City of HobokenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
  4. Carreno v. City of NewarkDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2011
  5. Judith A. Dinapoli v. Board of Education of the Township Of verona, Essex CountyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2014

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API