Legal Opinion
Cardona v. General Motors Corp.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided August 8, 1996No. Civil Action 95-2973, 95-1476PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ORLOFSKY, District Judge:
These consolidated appeals are before the court pursuant to Rule 40.D.4 of the General Rules of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey (hereinafter “General Rule 40.D.4”) which governs appeals from non-dispositive orders of a magistrate judge. The orders appealed from, which were filed on December 5, 1995, 1 disqualified Jay M. London, Esq. (“London”), and the law firm of Kimmel & Silverman, P.C., from further representing plaintiffs in these actions pursuant to Rules 1.9 and 1.10 of the Rules of Professional Conduct. 2
These appeals…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Dewey v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- Reardon v. Marlayne, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Marks v. StrubleDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2004
- Kala v. Aluminum Smelting & Refining Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
- Andrews v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
- Travelers Indem. Co. v. Dammann & Co., Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2008
- City of Kalamazoo v. Michigan Disposal Service Corp.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2000
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.