Legal Opinion
Upper Chehalis Tribe v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided October 9, 1957No. Appeal 1-56PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PER CURIÁM.
This is an appeal from a decision by the Indian Claims Commission in Docket No. 237, 4 Ind.Cls.Com. 301, dismissing the petition filed by the Indian claimants. Appellants take the position that there is no substantial evidence to support the ultimate findings of the Commission adverse to appellants and that the final determination of the Commission based upon such findings should be reversed.
In finding 23 the Commission finds that in the area claimed there were ab-originally a number of autonomous villages or tribelets known as the Copalis Tribe, the Humptulip Tribe, the Satsop…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. Alcea Band of TillamooksSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Otoe and Missouria Tribe of Indians v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955
- SNAKE OR PIUTE INDIANS, ETC. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
- Alcea Band of Tillamooks v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1945
- United States v. Otoe & Missouria Tribe of IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs Reservation of Oregon v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
- United States of America, Quinault Tribe of Indians, Intervenors-Plaintiffs v. State of Washington, Thor C. Tollefson, Director, Washington State Department of Fisheries, Intervenors-Defendants, Northwest Steelheaders Council of Trout Unlimited and Gary Ellis,intervenor-Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Quinault Tribe of Indians, Intervenors-Plaintiffs v. State of Washington, Thor C. Tollefson, Director, Washington State Department of Fisheries, Intervenors-Defendants, Washington Reef Net Owners Association, Intervenor-Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Quinault Tribe of Indians, Intervenors-Plaintiffs, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe v. State of Washington, Thor C. Tollefson, Etc., Intervenors-Defendants. United States of America, Quinault Tribe of Indians, Intervenors-Plaintiffs v. State of Washington, Thor C. Tollefson, Director, Washington State Department of Fisheries, Intervenors-Defendants, Carl Crouse, Director of the Department of Game, the Washington State Gamecommission, Intervenors-Defendants-Appellants. United States of America, Quinault Tribe of Indians, Intervenors-Plaintiffs v. State of Washington, Thor C. Tollefson, Director, Washington State Department of Fisheries, Intervenors-Defendants, Thor C. Tollefson, Director, Washington State Department of Fisheries, Intervenor-Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Quinault Tribe of Indians v. State of Washington, Thor C. Tollefson, Director, Washington State Department of Fisheries, Washington Reef Net Owners Association, United States of America, Quinault Tribe of Indians, Puyallup Tribe of Puyallup Reservation v. State of Washington, Thor C. Tollefson, Director, Washington State Department of Fisheries, United States of America, Quinault Tribe of Indians, Nisqually Indian Community of the Nisqually Reservation v. State of Washington, Thor C. Tollefson, Director, Washington State Department of FisheriesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Lipan Apache Tribe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- United States v. Seminole Indians of FloridaUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.