United States v. Seminole Indians of Florida
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the CourtCollins, Judge
This case comes before us on appeal by the United States from an interlocutory order of the Indian Claims Commission (hereinafter the Commission). Beview is sought with respect to the Commission’s determination that petitioners (appellees herein) “have satisfactorily established that at the time of the September 18,1823 treaty cession * * *, and long prior thereto, the Seminole Nation held [exclusive of certain designated areas] original Indian title to all of the present State of Florida * * The Commission’s order is challenged on the ground that there is no substantial evidence to support…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs Reservation of Oregon v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
- Spokane Tribe of Indians v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- Upper Chehalis Tribe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1957
3Cited by15 opinions
- Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida v. USACourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013
- Pueblo of Jemez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2023
- Seminole Indians v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
- Cherokee Freedmen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1971
- Bonnichsen v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.