Legal Opinion
State v. Eversole
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided October 27, 1994No. C14-94-00015-CR, C14-94-00016-CR, C14-94-00017-CR and C14-94-00018-CRPublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MAJORITY OPINION
CANNON, Justice.
The District Attorney for Harris County appeals the order of the district court quashing four indictments. The State brings five points of error challenging the district court’s decision. Upon review, we sustain the State’s first three points of error. However, we overrule the State’s fourth and fifth points of error and affirm the judgment.
The indictments involve two provisions of the Election Code, to wit, §§ 253.035(h) and 254.031(a)(3), (4). Section 253.035(h) provides:
Except as provided by Section 253.042, a candidate or officeholder who makes political…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Morrison v. ChanTexas Supreme Court · 1985
- Ex Parte RoloffTexas Supreme Court · 1974
- Osaka Shosen Kaisha Line v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Geters v. Eagle Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1992
- Ex Parte TrahanCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Natural Gas Clearinghouse v. Midgard Energy Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2003
- Clarke v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1996
- State v. Salinas, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1998
- Tamayo v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1996
- State v. Kinkle, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1995
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.