Legal Opinion
Tamayo v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)
Decided May 29, 1996No. 09-95-194 CRPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BURGESS, Justice.
Cristela Tamayo was found guilty, by a jury, of perjury. The court assessed her punishment at thirty days’ confinement in the county jail, probated for six months and a $250 fine. Tamayo brings five points of error. We shall address them in chronological, rather than numerical order.
Point of error three alleges the trial court erred in denying Tamayo’s Motion to Quash the information on the ground it was untimely. On March 14, 1995, Tamayo’s counsel received a Notice of Resetting with “Jury Trial” and “Pre-trial Motions” marked and the notation “This case is re-set…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Dinkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
- Broxton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
- Bisby v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1995
- State v. EversoleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Kagebein v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State of Texas v. Esparza, CarlosCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2013
- Dodson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2008
- Teague v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2008
- Allan Shane Westfall v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2010
- Allan Shane Westfall v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2010
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.