State v. Kinkle
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CANNON, Justice Assigned.
Appellee was charged with the offense of tampering with a governmental record. Tex.Penal Code Ann. § 37.10 (Vernon Supp. 1994). 1 Appellee moved to quash the indictment arguing that appellee’s alleged crime was chargeable solely under the statute requiring record-keeping by a motor vehicle salvage dealer. Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann. art. 6687-2 (Vernon Supp.1995). The trial court granted the motion to quash. In its sole point of error, the State contends the trial court erred in granting the appellee’s motion to quash. We sustain the State’s sole point of error,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
- Brooks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Cheney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- State v. EversoleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
- State v. Clarke, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Flores v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
- Thompson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2001
- Haywood v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2011
- Findlay v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1999
- State v. Thompson, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.