Legal Opinion

Clark v. Detroit Police Commissioner

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 2, 1941No. Calendar 41, 502PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.

Five petitions for mandamus were consolidated, tried together and brought here on one record. Petitioners are all retired members of the Detroit police department, each of whom, at the date of his retirement, had served more than 25 years in the department and was, therefore, entitled to pension “at the rate of one-half of the pay of the .rank in which such member was serving at the time of retirement,” according to the charter of the city of Detroit, title 4, chap. 21, § 23 (as amended March 19, 1923).

At various dates ranging from 1936 to 1939, petitioners had been promoted: Clark became…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smith v. Flint City CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Slavin v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Fricke v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1936

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City & Cty. of Denver v. District Court, Tec.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1978
  2. Ture v. Ecorse City CouncilMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Kunzig v. Liquor Control CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Kunzig v. Liquor Control CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API