Legal Opinion
Kunzig v. Liquor Control Commission
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided April 11, 1950No. Docket 41, Calendar 44,642Published
1Opinion of the Court
327 Mich. 474 (1950)
42 N.W.2d 247
KUNZIG
v.
LIQUOR CONTROL COMMISSION.
Docket No. 41, Calendar No. 44,642.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
Decided April 11, 1950.
Stephen J. Roth, Attorney General, Graydon G. Withey, Deputy Attorney General, Edmund E. Shepherd, Solicitor General, and Daniel J. O'Hara and Peter E. Bradt, Assistant Attorney General, for defendant.
Robert H. Dunn (Foss O. Eldred, of counsel), for intervenor.
BOYLES, C.J.
In this case we are asked to define the respective powers of the liquor control commission and the State civil service commission as applied to the plaintiff, under the 2…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- In Re DebsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. BrimsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- In Re Quarles and ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- City of Jackson v. Com'r of RevenueMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
- Rust v. ConradMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.