Kunzig v. Liquor Control Commission
Michigan Supreme Court
1DissentDethmers, J.
The primary question in this case is whether the liquor control commission may abolish a position in the State classified civil service under its jurisdiction without the approval of the civil service commission. In approaching this question, it is my view that the constitutional provision (Mich Const 1908, art 16, § 11, adopted in 1932) that the liquor control commission shall exercise, subject to statutory limitations, complete control of the liquor traffic, does not serve to place the liquor control commission, for purposes of decision herein, in a position stronger or different than that…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- In Re DebsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. BrimsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- In Re Quarles and ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- City of Jackson v. Com'r of RevenueMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
- Rust v. ConradMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.