Legal Opinion

Rosso v. State Personnel Board

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1966No. 37441Published

1Opinion of the Court

68 Wn.2d 16 (1966)

411 P.2d 138

LOUIS ROSSO, Respondent,

v.

THE STATE PERSONNEL BOARD et al., Appellants.[*]

No. 37441.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

February 17, 1966.

The Attorney General and R. Ted Bottiger, Assistant, for appellants.

Corbett, Siderius & Lonergan and Maurice M. Epstein, for respondent.

HAMILTON, J.

Plaintiff Rosso (respondent here) is the manager of a state owned liquor store in West Seattle. As such, he is an employee of the Washington State Liquor Control Board. On April 22, 1963, pursuant to Article 20, § 2, of the Merit System Rules[1] as promulgated by the State…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Ott; Concurrence · Weaver.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Pierce v. Society of SistersSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Washington Beauty College, Inc. v. HuseWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Ajax v. GregoryWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Acme Finance Co. v. HuseWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Peterson v. HaganWashington Supreme Court · 1960

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API