Rosso v. State Personnel Board
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
68 Wn.2d 16 (1966)
411 P.2d 138
LOUIS ROSSO, Respondent,
v.
THE STATE PERSONNEL BOARD et al., Appellants.[*]
No. 37441.
The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
February 17, 1966.
The Attorney General and R. Ted Bottiger, Assistant, for appellants.
Corbett, Siderius & Lonergan and Maurice M. Epstein, for respondent.
HAMILTON, J.
Plaintiff Rosso (respondent here) is the manager of a state owned liquor store in West Seattle. As such, he is an employee of the Washington State Liquor Control Board. On April 22, 1963, pursuant to Article 20, § 2, of the Merit System Rules[1] as promulgated by the State…
Also in this document: Concurrence · Ott; Concurrence · Weaver.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Pierce v. Society of SistersSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Washington Beauty College, Inc. v. HuseWashington Supreme Court · 1938
- Ajax v. GregoryWashington Supreme Court · 1934
- Acme Finance Co. v. HuseWashington Supreme Court · 1937
- Peterson v. HaganWashington Supreme Court · 1960
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.